Continue Your Education


“Taking Time Off”
February 13, 2007, 9:27 pm
Filed under: Uncategorized

In the recent article “Taking Time Off” in The February 5 Columbia Spectator (http://www.columbiaspectator.com/home/index.cfm?event=displayArticle&ustory_id=c12f071c-62c4-4051-a701-021d3dd95de4), Devika Bhushan explores a variety of students’ reasons for taking time off from college.  She is specifically interested in undergraduates who take off a year to pursue other interests, but she cites a remarkable statistic from the U.S. Department of Education’s 2002 Condition of Education Report: “Seventy-three percent of all undergraduates in the 1999-2000 academic year were defined as nontraditional students who did not enroll full-time in college immediately after high school, supported themselves, or held full-time jobs during the school year.”

After more than ten years in continuing ed, I was shocked by the seventy-three percent figure.  I think that if such statistics were better known, nontraditional students would be more likely to enroll in programs and courses of all kinds, and any stigma surrounding a generation gap in classes would be mitigated.


1 Comment so far
Leave a comment

I followed up on the “Taking Time Off” story with a few quetions for the writer:

1) Are you a student? If yes, year and program?

I’m a junior at Columbia College, majoring in Neuroscience and Behavior.

2) Would you describe yourself as a “traditional” student?
Why or why not?

Yes, I would. I have taken no time off at any point during my education so far.

3) What was the genesis of the article “Taking Time Off”?

I got the sense, just anecdotally, that plenty of people were electing to take time off either before college or during college, as their perspectives, career aspirations, and expectations of their college experience evolved and/or diverged from what they’d expected. I also got the sense from talking to people that there were plenty of very edifying, valuable experiences that one could only get outside the classroom–and that school almost sometimes stood in the way of one’s growth, or would at least be worth much more after certain kinds of goals could be identified through outside experiences. I wanted to explore how widespread the trend really was, what the typical motivations for taking time off were, and how they impacted students’
views of the role of education and the college experience within the context of life development.

4) Were you surprised by any of the findings from your
research or interviews on the subject? Which?

I had heard many of the stories previously, but I was surprised at how widespread the disillusionment with peoples’ college experiences had been, and how frequently their expectations had been met with disappointment, and how strongly this factored into the decision to take time off. I was also surprised at how profound some of the changes some people had undergone during their time off were–one girl decided against her lifelong dream of pursuing medicine, another started dating someone who she is now married to.

5) I notice several articles in the Spectator about older
students taking classes with traditional-age undergraduates; what do you think the perception is of non-traditional students in the college classroom here or elsewhere?

I’m not sure I can provide a comprehensive account of what the perception is. I know that there’s isn’t a whole lot of social interaction among traditional and non-traditional undergrads, both because of often vastly differing non-academic commitments (family,
work) for non-traditional undergrads which often keeps them from participating as much in on-campus extracurriculars, but I also have the sense that the residence hall systems being so different for General Studies students and other Columbia undergrads contributes to this.

Comment by continueyoureducation




Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>